Thursday, October 6, 2016

It's time to #FixMassAve

I should be doing reading right now for Fred's class, so forgive me, Fred, if my response this week is a little thin, but it's time to talk about fixing Massachusetts Avenue.

Mass Ave is the north-south thoroughfare for Boston and Cambridge. It may not have as many cars as some other roads, but with the Red Line, and cyclists, and especially tens of thousands (perhaps more than 100,000) bus passengers along much of it, it is the main drag. It connects Harvard, MIT, Berklee, Symphony Hall and Boston Medical Center and comes within a stone's throw of the MFA, the BPL, BU and Northeastern. It doesn't touch downtown Boston, but does touch some of the most important innovation, education and medical centers in the state, if not the world.

The level of human capital along Mass Ave may be unmatched by any single four-mile stretch of roadway in the world. Yet we accept a dangerous road choked with single-occupancy vehicles blocking transit vehicles and endangering the lives of everyone else. This must change.

In the last five years, there have three cycling fatalities on the street that I can think of off my head: One at Beacon, one at Vassar and the most recent one in Porter Square. All have involved large commercial vehicles. These have not been daredevil bike messenger types: they've been doctors, researchers, and engineers; the "second order" of cyclists: the people who are biking because there are better facilities and because there are more cyclists.

But the facilities we have are disconnected, and they are not good enough. There have been innumerable close calls. Buses transporting thousands cut in and out of stops across the bus lane because god forbid we would remove parking to build floating bus stops or separated lanes. The road was designed, mostly in the 1940s to 1960s, for throughput and parking, even though people in cars are the minority of users of the corridor.

It's high time for that to change.

This page (and its author) has spent a lot of time discussing Mass Ave and advocating strategies to make it a complete street, one built for safety of all users first, and then built for transit, bicycling and pedestrians before people in cars. (Deliveries are important, too; we should build loading zones where commercial vehicles can safely load and unload without impeding traffic.) It is time to stop talking about what we could do and start talking about what we will do. In many cases in Boston and Cambridge, street real estate makes such implementation quite hard: we're an old city with very narrow streets. But not on Mass Ave. In most cases, there's plenty of room to build something better. Parking on both sides: medians (I'm looking at you, highway north of Harvard Square), multiple lanes catering to people in cars at the expense of everyone else.

Mass Ave connects many some of the great institutions of the world. Technology? MIT and Kendall Square. Law, arts, sciences? Harvard. Contemporary Music? Berklee. Classical Music? Symphony Hall. Cities? Boston and Cambridge. Yet these institutions are linked by a thoroughly mediocre street, one which wouldn't pass muster in many of the world's great cities.

Here's what I have so far. Let's talk about this further. Let's meet and talk about the plusses and the minuses. Let's not leave anyone out, but let's remember that it's 2016, not 1966, and we're planning for a sustainable, mobile future, not one where everyone sits in a traffic jam:

Harvard-Porter-Arlington
Central Square
Harvard Bridge
Beacon Street

So here's my call to politicians and citizens: let's make that change. Let's rebuild a Mass Ave that works for everyone, not just people in cars. Let's create a street that says: "yes, this is a place I want to be, and a place I want to go." Let's #FixMassAve.

Now, back to my reading.

7 comments:

  1. What are your feelings (or the latest research on) separated shared bus/bike lanes?

    I used these all the time in Paris, never felt like conflict was much of a problem. See Boulevard de Sébastopol as an example.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They're … okay, but you probably want to avoid them if possible, especially in high bike use and high bus use corridors. If there's 50 bikes an hour and a bus every 6 minutes, the chance of a bus getting stuck behind a slow cyclist is relatively small. In this corridor, there are 300 bikes per hour and a bus every 2 minutes, so it is much larger.

      Delete
    2. The lanes I mentioned were wide enough for buses to pass cyclists without too much difficulty. There seemed to be surprisingly little conflict, and I'd put the numbers there close to 300/hr & bus/2min.

      Delete
  2. Here Here!!!!! Wonderful post! We are with you. I am writing to my representatives with a link to your page. Keep up the good work and lets make sure this happens.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Any plans to cover the MBTA service delivery policy? It would be interesting to see how current routes measure up to the proposed standards.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'd like to ask the city to take a better look at parallel streets as alternate through routes: turning Harvard Street in particular into a neighborhood greenway with two-way bicycle traffic. The Franklin Street/Green Street one-way pair also has promise but the city has actually made it less useful by reversing the one-way direction at its east end.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your web site and in accession capital to assert that I acquire actually enjoyed account your blog posts. Any way I will be subscribing to your augment and even I achievement you access consistently rapidly. fall protection system

    ReplyDelete